Free Essays on Popular Sovereignty - Brainia.com.
On the slavery issue, Cass defended the doctrine of popular sovereignty, which held that the residents of federal territories should decide for themselves whether to become a free state or a slave state.
Popular Sovereignty Developed by Lewis Cass Allow people who settle a territory to vote and determine to be a slave state or free state Election of 1848 Democrats nominated Lewis Cass Whigs nominated Zachary Taylor Free-Soil Party nominated Martin Van Buren Made of some Whigs who opposed slavery and antislavery Democrats (defection threatens to destroy Democratic party) Taylor defeats Cass and.
Another condition on the Compromise of 1850 was that the Western Territories were to address the issue of slavery using popular sovereignty. The idea of this popular sovereignty, introduced by Senators Stephen Douglas and Lewis Cass, was that the people in a certain region would use their own judgment and decide whether or not to take in the institute of slavery.
Describe the basic tenets of popular (or squatter) sovereignty. (p.332) The actual territorial settler decided on slavery in the territories 4. Name the major political supporters of popular (or squatter) sovereignty. (p.333).
In the 1850s, in the run-up to the Civil War, Northern Democrats led by Senator Lewis Cass of Michigan and Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois promoted popular sovereignty as a middle position on the slavery issue. It said that actual residents of territories should be able to decide by voting whether or not slavery would be allowed in the territory.
Democrats and “ Popular Sovereignty. ” The Democratic Party tried to diffuse “ Southern rights ” and the slavery issue with a compromise called “ popular sovereignty. ” Identified in 1848 with the candidacy of Lewis Cass of Michigan, popular sovereignty left it to a territory ’ s settlers whether or not to allow slavery within its borders.
Popular sovereignty is a doctrine rooted in the belief that each citizen has sovereignty over themselves. Citizens may unite and offer to delegate a portion of their sovereign powers and duties to those who wish to serve as officers of the state, contingent on the officers agreeing to serve according to the will of the people.In the United States, the term has been used to express this concept.